dc.contributor.advisor | Zaccarello, Benedetta | |
dc.creator | Orlova, Kseniia | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-17T11:36:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-17T11:36:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/91151 | |
dc.description.abstract | The idea that dance can be understood as an act of communication and a form of language has been already taken into account by scholars. The hypothesis that will be discussed in this MA dissertation concerns a more specific matter: a semiotic approach to different forms of dance improvisation, and notably the method traditionally labeled "intuitive dance". To understand this phenomena two main concepts will be conveyed: that of "quotation" understood via W. Benjamin's essays on Brecht, and that of "notation", as defined by N. Goodman in his Languages of art. Can we understand dance as a language - id est a quotable and notable code - even in its more intuitive forms? How is it possible to "understand", "quote" and "address" gestures, even in front of a wide heterogeneous audience and without any prefixed choreography but only on the base of a free and in-time creating process? Can we understand improvisation as a complex code? what and how does this code mean? Keywords: improvisation, Intuitive Dance, semiotics, notation, gesture, Nelson Goodman, Walter Benjamin, dance, code | cs_CZ |
dc.description.abstract | The idea that dance can be understood as an act of communication and a form of language has been already taken into account by scholars. The hypothesis that will be discussed in this MA dissertation concerns a more specific matter: a semiotic approach to different forms of dance improvisation, and notably the method traditionally labeled "intuitive dance". To understand this phenomena two main concepts will be conveyed: that of "quotation" understood via W. Benjamin's essays on Brecht, and that of "notation", as defined by N. Goodman in his Languages of art. Can we understand dance as a language - id est a quotable and notable code - even in its more intuitive forms? How is it possible to "understand", "quote" and "address" gestures, even in front of a wide heterogeneous audience and without any prefixed choreography but only on the base of a free and in-time creating process? Can we understand improvisation as a complex code? what and how does this code mean? Keywords: improvisation, Intuitive Dance, semiotics, notation, gesture, Nelson Goodman, Walter Benjamin, dance, code | en_US |
dc.language | English | cs_CZ |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta humanitních studií | cs_CZ |
dc.subject | improvisation | en_US |
dc.subject | Intuitive Dance | en_US |
dc.subject | semiotics | en_US |
dc.subject | notation | en_US |
dc.subject | gesture | en_US |
dc.subject | Nelson Goodman | en_US |
dc.subject | Walter Benjamin | en_US |
dc.subject | dance | en_US |
dc.subject | code | en_US |
dc.subject | improvizace | cs_CZ |
dc.subject | Intuitivní Tanec | cs_CZ |
dc.subject | semiotika | cs_CZ |
dc.subject | zápis | cs_CZ |
dc.subject | gesto | cs_CZ |
dc.subject | Nelson Goodman | cs_CZ |
dc.subject | Walter Benjamin | cs_CZ |
dc.subject | tanec | cs_CZ |
dc.subject | kód | cs_CZ |
dc.title | Codes of dance improvisation: The case of Intuitive Dance | en_US |
dc.type | diplomová práce | cs_CZ |
dcterms.created | 2017 | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2017-09-14 | |
dc.description.department | Katedra elektronické kultury a sémiotiky | cs_CZ |
dc.description.department | Department of Electronic Culture and Semiotics | en_US |
dc.description.faculty | Faculty of Humanities | en_US |
dc.description.faculty | Fakulta humanitních studií | cs_CZ |
dc.identifier.repId | 174253 | |
dc.title.translated | Kódy taneční improvizace: Případ Intuitivního Tance | cs_CZ |
dc.contributor.referee | Marcelli, Miroslav | |
dc.identifier.aleph | 002154185 | |
thesis.degree.name | Mgr. | |
thesis.degree.level | navazující magisterské | cs_CZ |
thesis.degree.discipline | Electronic Culture and Semiotics | en_US |
thesis.degree.discipline | Elektronická kultura a sémiotika | cs_CZ |
thesis.degree.program | Media and Communications Studies | en_US |
thesis.degree.program | Mediální a komunikační studia | cs_CZ |
uk.thesis.type | diplomová práce | cs_CZ |
uk.taxonomy.organization-cs | Fakulta humanitních studií::Katedra elektronické kultury a sémiotiky | cs_CZ |
uk.taxonomy.organization-en | Faculty of Humanities::Department of Electronic Culture and Semiotics | en_US |
uk.faculty-name.cs | Fakulta humanitních studií | cs_CZ |
uk.faculty-name.en | Faculty of Humanities | en_US |
uk.faculty-abbr.cs | FHS | cs_CZ |
uk.degree-discipline.cs | Elektronická kultura a sémiotika | cs_CZ |
uk.degree-discipline.en | Electronic Culture and Semiotics | en_US |
uk.degree-program.cs | Mediální a komunikační studia | cs_CZ |
uk.degree-program.en | Media and Communications Studies | en_US |
thesis.grade.cs | Velmi dobře | cs_CZ |
thesis.grade.en | Very good | en_US |
uk.abstract.cs | The idea that dance can be understood as an act of communication and a form of language has been already taken into account by scholars. The hypothesis that will be discussed in this MA dissertation concerns a more specific matter: a semiotic approach to different forms of dance improvisation, and notably the method traditionally labeled "intuitive dance". To understand this phenomena two main concepts will be conveyed: that of "quotation" understood via W. Benjamin's essays on Brecht, and that of "notation", as defined by N. Goodman in his Languages of art. Can we understand dance as a language - id est a quotable and notable code - even in its more intuitive forms? How is it possible to "understand", "quote" and "address" gestures, even in front of a wide heterogeneous audience and without any prefixed choreography but only on the base of a free and in-time creating process? Can we understand improvisation as a complex code? what and how does this code mean? Keywords: improvisation, Intuitive Dance, semiotics, notation, gesture, Nelson Goodman, Walter Benjamin, dance, code | cs_CZ |
uk.abstract.en | The idea that dance can be understood as an act of communication and a form of language has been already taken into account by scholars. The hypothesis that will be discussed in this MA dissertation concerns a more specific matter: a semiotic approach to different forms of dance improvisation, and notably the method traditionally labeled "intuitive dance". To understand this phenomena two main concepts will be conveyed: that of "quotation" understood via W. Benjamin's essays on Brecht, and that of "notation", as defined by N. Goodman in his Languages of art. Can we understand dance as a language - id est a quotable and notable code - even in its more intuitive forms? How is it possible to "understand", "quote" and "address" gestures, even in front of a wide heterogeneous audience and without any prefixed choreography but only on the base of a free and in-time creating process? Can we understand improvisation as a complex code? what and how does this code mean? Keywords: improvisation, Intuitive Dance, semiotics, notation, gesture, Nelson Goodman, Walter Benjamin, dance, code | en_US |
uk.file-availability | V | |
uk.grantor | Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta humanitních studií, Katedra elektronické kultury a sémiotiky | cs_CZ |
thesis.grade.code | 2 | |
uk.publication-place | Praha | cs_CZ |
dc.identifier.lisID | 990021541850106986 | |