dc.contributor | | |
dc.creator | Richard Müller | |
dc.date | 2017 | |
dc.date | | |
dc.date | | |
dc.date | | |
dc.date | | |
dc.date | | |
dc.date | | |
dc.date | | |
dc.date | | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-28T11:05:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-28T11:05:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier | ISSN 2336–6729 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/97252 | |
dc.description | | |
dc.description | | |
dc.description | In this article, the question of the specific logic underlying the New Historical conception of therelation between text and context leads, first, to the exploration of the extent to which StephenGreenblatt builds his analysis of the English Renaissance theatre on Pierre Bourdieu’s sociologicalconception of general economy of practices and symbolic goods. It is shown, secondly, how theNew Historical latent conception of symbolic economy is built on the precondition of heteronomyof different social and cultural fields in the early modern period. Also, it is pointed out how NewHistoricism develops a self-reflective strategy within its historical epistemology by incorporatingitself into the tradition of cultural critique born in the context of the “conquest” of the New Worldwhereby a category of cultural difference was generated. Thirdly, both conceptions of symboliceconomy (Bourdieu’s and Greenblatt’s) are compared to the project of Georges Bataille of “accursedshare”, developed in the 1930’s and 1940’s, and his outline of a peculiar logic of general economy,which negates the very foundations of economic thinking. It is explained how all three conceptionsare based on Marcel Mauss’s “discovery” of the economy of gift in archaic societies (later critiquesof Mauss’s interpretation of the ethnographic material are taken into account). Bataille’s perspectiveof general economy is followed, where various historical societies face the problem of surplus andwhere the consumption of excessive resources acquires different forms of creativity in art, anddestructivity in war and sacrifice. Bataille’s “delirant vision” (Goux) is taken as providing a possiblecritical angle on the limits of the “symbolic economies” of New Historicism and Bourdieu’s sociologynot only as their analytical tools, but also as part of their own foundations as scholarly projects.54 SVĚT LITERATURY 56Finally, the New Historical relation to the rhetorical tradition is understood as a moment wherebythe limits of its symbolic economy (its subordination to the logic of capital accumulation) might beparadoxically transcended. | |
dc.format | | |
dc.format | | |
dc.format | | |
dc.publisher | Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy | |
dc.relation | | |
dc.relation | | |
dc.relation | | |
dc.relation | | |
dc.relation | | |
dc.relation | | |
dc.relation | | |
dc.relation | | |
dc.relation | | |
dc.relation | | |
dc.relation | | |
dc.relation | | |
dc.relation | | |
dc.relation | | |
dc.rights | | |
dc.rights | | |
dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/ | |
dc.source | Svět literatury: Časopis pro novodobé literatury, 2017, 56, 22-54 | |
dc.subject | symbolická ekonomie | |
dc.subject | obecná ekonomie | |
dc.subject | nový historismus | |
dc.subject | Stephen Greenblatt | |
dc.subject | Georges Bataille | |
dc.subject | Pierre Bourdieu | |
dc.subject | sebereflektivita | |
dc.subject | symbolic economy | |
dc.subject | general economy | |
dc.subject | New Historicism | |
dc.subject | self-reflectivity | |
dc.subject | | |
dc.subject | | |
dc.title | Distance, iluze, prokletí zisku. Problémy (nejen) novohistorické symbolické ekonomie | |
dc.title | DISTANCE, ILLUSION, THE CURSE OF GAIN: PROBLEMS OF (NOT ONLY) THE NEW HISTORICAL SYMBOLIC ECONOMY | |
dc.type | | |
dc.type | Článek | cs_CZ |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.coverage | | |
dc.coverage | | |
dc.coverage | | |
uk.internal-type | uk_publication | |
dc.description.startPage | 22 | |
dc.description.endPage | 54 | |
dcterms.isPartOf.name | Svět literatury: Časopis pro novodobé literatury | cs_CZ |
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear | 2017 | |
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume | 2017 | |
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue | 56 | |