Zabrání věci a zabrání části majetku v platné právní úpravě
Seizure of property and seizure of part of the property in the current legislation
diploma thesis (DEFENDED)
View/ Open
Permanent link
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/186424Identifiers
Study Information System: 256853
Collections
- Kvalifikační práce [14023]
Author
Advisor
Referee
Vokoun, Rudolf
Faculty / Institute
Faculty of Law
Discipline
Law
Department
Department of Criminal Law
Date of defense
26. 9. 2023
Publisher
Univerzita Karlova, Právnická fakultaLanguage
Czech
Grade
Excellent
Keywords (Czech)
Konfiskace, Trestní právo, Trestní sankce, Zabrání věci, Zabrání části majetkuKeywords (English)
Confiscation, Criminal law, Criminal sanctions, Seizure of property, Seizure of part of propertyCriminal Code Act No. 40/2009 Coll. distinguishes criminal sanctions into penalties and protective measures. This distinction is called dualism of criminal sanctions. Protective measures are broadly subdivided into protective measures restricting personal liberty and protective measures affecting property. These 'property protection measures' have long been represented by the protective measure of seizure of property under Section 101 of the Criminal Code, which was linked to similar protective measures in previous substantive criminal law. Amendment No. 55/2017 Coll. to the Criminal Procedure Code, in response to the so-called Confiscation Directive 2014/42/EU, introduced a new protective measure of seizure of part of the property pursuant to Section 102a of the Criminal Procedure Code. An alternative solution with significant doctrinal support was considered, including the creation of a special regulation for a more comprehensive solution to the confiscation issue and a more appropriate settlement with the principles contained in general criminal law. The seizure of property serves to seize an item through which there is a threat of committing or supporting criminal activity. The seizure of part of the property, similarly to the provisions of Section 101 of the Criminal Code, aims at the...
Criminal Code Act No. 40/2009 Coll. distinguishes criminal sanctions into penalties and protective measures. This distinction is called dualism of criminal sanctions. Protective measures are broadly subdivided into protective measures restricting personal liberty and protective measures affecting property. These 'property protection measures' have long been represented by the protective measure of seizure of property under Section 101 of the Criminal Code, which was linked to similar protective measures in previous substantive criminal law. Amendment No. 55/2017 Coll. to the Criminal Procedure Code, in response to the so-called Confiscation Directive 2014/42/EU, introduced a new protective measure of seizure of part of the property pursuant to Section 102a of the Criminal Procedure Code. An alternative solution with significant doctrinal support was considered, including the creation of a special regulation for a more comprehensive solution to the confiscation issue and a more appropriate settlement with the principles contained in general criminal law. The seizure of property serves to seize an item through which there is a threat of committing or supporting criminal activity. The seizure of part of the property, similarly to the provisions of Section 101 of the Criminal Code, aims at the...