Zobrazit minimální záznam

Seizure of property and seizure of part of the property in the current legislation
dc.contributor.advisorRichter, Martin
dc.creatorBlažek, Jiří
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-08T01:27:56Z
dc.date.available2023-11-08T01:27:56Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/186424
dc.description.abstractCriminal Code Act No. 40/2009 Coll. distinguishes criminal sanctions into penalties and protective measures. This distinction is called dualism of criminal sanctions. Protective measures are broadly subdivided into protective measures restricting personal liberty and protective measures affecting property. These 'property protection measures' have long been represented by the protective measure of seizure of property under Section 101 of the Criminal Code, which was linked to similar protective measures in previous substantive criminal law. Amendment No. 55/2017 Coll. to the Criminal Procedure Code, in response to the so-called Confiscation Directive 2014/42/EU, introduced a new protective measure of seizure of part of the property pursuant to Section 102a of the Criminal Procedure Code. An alternative solution with significant doctrinal support was considered, including the creation of a special regulation for a more comprehensive solution to the confiscation issue and a more appropriate settlement with the principles contained in general criminal law. The seizure of property serves to seize an item through which there is a threat of committing or supporting criminal activity. The seizure of part of the property, similarly to the provisions of Section 101 of the Criminal Code, aims at the...en_US
dc.description.abstractCriminal Code Act No. 40/2009 Coll. distinguishes criminal sanctions into penalties and protective measures. This distinction is called dualism of criminal sanctions. Protective measures are broadly subdivided into protective measures restricting personal liberty and protective measures affecting property. These 'property protection measures' have long been represented by the protective measure of seizure of property under Section 101 of the Criminal Code, which was linked to similar protective measures in previous substantive criminal law. Amendment No. 55/2017 Coll. to the Criminal Procedure Code, in response to the so-called Confiscation Directive 2014/42/EU, introduced a new protective measure of seizure of part of the property pursuant to Section 102a of the Criminal Procedure Code. An alternative solution with significant doctrinal support was considered, including the creation of a special regulation for a more comprehensive solution to the confiscation issue and a more appropriate settlement with the principles contained in general criminal law. The seizure of property serves to seize an item through which there is a threat of committing or supporting criminal activity. The seizure of part of the property, similarly to the provisions of Section 101 of the Criminal Code, aims at the...cs_CZ
dc.languageČeštinacs_CZ
dc.language.isocs_CZ
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Právnická fakultacs_CZ
dc.subjectConfiscationen_US
dc.subjectCriminal lawen_US
dc.subjectCriminal sanctionsen_US
dc.subjectSeizure of propertyen_US
dc.subjectSeizure of part of propertyen_US
dc.subjectKonfiskacecs_CZ
dc.subjectTrestní právocs_CZ
dc.subjectTrestní sankcecs_CZ
dc.subjectZabrání věcics_CZ
dc.subjectZabrání části majetkucs_CZ
dc.titleZabrání věci a zabrání části majetku v platné právní úpravěcs_CZ
dc.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
dcterms.created2023
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-09-26
dc.description.departmentKatedra trestního právacs_CZ
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Criminal Lawen_US
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Lawen_US
dc.description.facultyPrávnická fakultacs_CZ
dc.identifier.repId256853
dc.title.translatedSeizure of property and seizure of part of the property in the current legislationen_US
dc.contributor.refereeVokoun, Rudolf
thesis.degree.nameMgr.
thesis.degree.levelmagisterskécs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplinePrávocs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineLawen_US
thesis.degree.programLaw and Jurisprudenceen_US
thesis.degree.programPrávo a právní vědacs_CZ
uk.thesis.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-csPrávnická fakulta::Katedra trestního právacs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-enFaculty of Law::Department of Criminal Lawen_US
uk.faculty-name.csPrávnická fakultacs_CZ
uk.faculty-name.enFaculty of Lawen_US
uk.faculty-abbr.csPFcs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.csPrávocs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.enLawen_US
uk.degree-program.csPrávo a právní vědacs_CZ
uk.degree-program.enLaw and Jurisprudenceen_US
thesis.grade.csVýborněcs_CZ
thesis.grade.enExcellenten_US
uk.abstract.csCriminal Code Act No. 40/2009 Coll. distinguishes criminal sanctions into penalties and protective measures. This distinction is called dualism of criminal sanctions. Protective measures are broadly subdivided into protective measures restricting personal liberty and protective measures affecting property. These 'property protection measures' have long been represented by the protective measure of seizure of property under Section 101 of the Criminal Code, which was linked to similar protective measures in previous substantive criminal law. Amendment No. 55/2017 Coll. to the Criminal Procedure Code, in response to the so-called Confiscation Directive 2014/42/EU, introduced a new protective measure of seizure of part of the property pursuant to Section 102a of the Criminal Procedure Code. An alternative solution with significant doctrinal support was considered, including the creation of a special regulation for a more comprehensive solution to the confiscation issue and a more appropriate settlement with the principles contained in general criminal law. The seizure of property serves to seize an item through which there is a threat of committing or supporting criminal activity. The seizure of part of the property, similarly to the provisions of Section 101 of the Criminal Code, aims at the...cs_CZ
uk.abstract.enCriminal Code Act No. 40/2009 Coll. distinguishes criminal sanctions into penalties and protective measures. This distinction is called dualism of criminal sanctions. Protective measures are broadly subdivided into protective measures restricting personal liberty and protective measures affecting property. These 'property protection measures' have long been represented by the protective measure of seizure of property under Section 101 of the Criminal Code, which was linked to similar protective measures in previous substantive criminal law. Amendment No. 55/2017 Coll. to the Criminal Procedure Code, in response to the so-called Confiscation Directive 2014/42/EU, introduced a new protective measure of seizure of part of the property pursuant to Section 102a of the Criminal Procedure Code. An alternative solution with significant doctrinal support was considered, including the creation of a special regulation for a more comprehensive solution to the confiscation issue and a more appropriate settlement with the principles contained in general criminal law. The seizure of property serves to seize an item through which there is a threat of committing or supporting criminal activity. The seizure of part of the property, similarly to the provisions of Section 101 of the Criminal Code, aims at the...en_US
uk.file-availabilityV
uk.grantorUniverzita Karlova, Právnická fakulta, Katedra trestního právacs_CZ
thesis.grade.code1
uk.publication-placePrahacs_CZ
uk.thesis.defenceStatusO


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV